Sunday, June 19, 2011



Morrill Hall Still Unwilling

to Face Reality at 

University of Minnesota?


To illustrate the challenge of getting Morrill Hall to face reality, see a portion of the short video of President Bruininks being interviewed by Esme Murphy this morning on 'CCO. Truly a Five Pinocchio performance.


1. Very few universities have not seen a marked increase in applications: More than 28,000 students applied to be part of UW-Madison's freshman class in the fall, a record number and the biggest increase in at least 20 years.


2. The Promise Scholarship pot of gold - $350 million - at 5% will yield $70 per student based on an enrollment of 25,000 undergrads. For a comparison of the actual cost of attending the U of M and the University of North Carolina for a student with minimal financial resources, please see: For I have promises to keep... The debt load for a student/parent at North Carolina at graduation is ZERO dollars, while the Minnesota student/parent will have to borrow  $34,400.


3. President Bruininks has the chutzpah to claim: "The quality of education is better now today than it has been in any of the 42 years that I have been at the University of Minnesota." 


FIVE PINOCCHIOS


There is plenty of evidence to counter the President's claim, for example:


a. "As for commitment to quality education at an affordable cost? Meaningless drivel. The administration has flatly failed on its promises of excellence and affordability." Daily (13 Oct 2009)
b. "Davis-Blake said that quality is going down because the quality of the student experience has declined, which is related to uncontrollable central costs. At the Carlson School, they have fewer TAs, fewer classes, more students in classes, the building is less clean, there are fewer advisers, they have more adjuncts, and they have less information technology. All of these things are happening." Former Carlson School Dean Davis-Blake who has left for Michigan.

There will be more on this in due course. We have a lot of work to do at the University of Minnesota so that we can be an institution of which the state can be proud.  I hope the next administration does a much better job and re-establishes our land grant priorities.


However it is important to face up to our problems and not try to sweep them under the rug. This strategy has been a dismal failure.



No comments: