… in the Minneapolis Star Tribune notes that the most charitable description of what’s been going on at the clubby University of Minnesota medical school would be “bizarre.”
Thursday, February 21, 2008
Tuition Too High For You At U of M?
If You Are A Good Student, Maybe You Should Apply to Stanford...
It may actually be less expensive for you to go there.
CNN reports a solution to ballooning endowments. Free tuition for lower income families is becoming increasingly popular among the super rich academic institutions:
Stanford eliminates tuition for some students
If You Are A Good Student, Maybe You Should Apply to Stanford...
It may actually be less expensive for you to go there.
CNN reports a solution to ballooning endowments. Free tuition for lower income families is becoming increasingly popular among the super rich academic institutions:
Stanford eliminates tuition for some students
Students whose families make less than $100,000 will attend school free; about a third of students will be helped.
The university said Wednesday it plans to eliminate tuition for students with annual family incomes totaling less than $100,000. It also will pay most room and board for students with families making less than $60,000.
Financial aid director Karen Cooper says the move comes as middle-income parents express concern about paying for a Stanford education.
Stanford tuition is expected to rise to $36,000 in the fall. Room and board will cost about $11,000. About a third of the university's 6,700 undergraduates are expected to qualify for the tuition break.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
That's interesting. As a Berkeley grad I'm not sure if I'd want my kid to go to Stanford, but my daughter would qualify for the full ride since my total family income is under $60,000. But there's no Tuition break for her as the child of a U professor.
This pretty much says it all, Momo.
You are a full time faculty member at the U of M and yet your daughter would qualify for the maximum student aid because your salary is under 60K$.
Pitiful.
Also note that OurLeader claimed that a 7.5% tuition increase was "minimal." 7.5% of his salary would be about 40K$, which is more than many of the AFSCME workers make. Is this minimal?
And the treatment of non-scientific or technical parts of the University is a disgrace. The situation in Folwell Hall is but one example.
Let's hope that in two more years the folly of the current university administration will be obvious and that a change in course will be taken.
I wouldn't bet on it, however.
Best,
Bonso
Post a Comment