… in the Minneapolis Star Tribune notes that the most charitable description of what’s been going on at the clubby University of Minnesota medical school would be “bizarre.”
Friday, July 31, 2015
Student Debt: Fiction v. Fact
Exhibit A: "You can spend a lot more than that for a new car if you want to."
Remark of President Kaler (referring to the $30,000 average student debt in Minnesota among the two-thirds who graduate with student loans) at p. 58 of the August 2015 issue of Minnesota Monthly.
This remark fails to recognize that the cost of an undergraduate degree is not limited to the debt incurred. That debt is incurred only after students and their parents have exhausted their savings and student earnings. It also fails to recognize that the debt incurred by students in the graduate and professional schools is far greater than any car those students will ever be able to afford (in the range of $150,000 to $200,000 for many).
What this remark does demonstrate is that the senior administrators and the Regents are so far removed from the economic lives of students and their parents and the public at large that they are seemingly oblivious to the financial hardship that results from their decisions to spend other people's money.
Exhibit B: "When people complain about tuition, I tell them to talk to legislators."
Remark of President Kaler at the March 23, 2012 meeting of the Civic Caucus.
It is not accurate to simply blame the state legislature. Skyrocketing tuition during the decade from 2002 to 2012 far exceeded reductions in state appropriations as the annual budget for the U of M exploded from $2 billion to $3 billion. See:
Whose Fault--Crushing Student Debt
and
Devouring Our Children
Exhibit C: "I promise to reduce administrative costs by $90 million over the next six years."
Pledge of President Kaler to the state legislature.
Such a reduction will simply slow the rate of increase in the costs of administration. The fact is that the costs of administration now consume 29% of the operating budget of the University, and those costs continue to rise despite the reduction of certain administrative expenses. See section 4 and section 5 in:
The Management of the University
Moreover, the reduction of $90 million in certain administrative expenses over the six year period will not reduce the U of M budget by a single penny. President Kaler intends instead to simply spend the $90 million on "mission" and "mission support." See:
The Phantom Reduction
Michael W. McNabb
University of Minnesota B.A.1971; J.D. 1974
University of Minnesota Alumni Association life member
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment